About Me

Name: Sgt Relic
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

And the Pulitzer Prize goes to…

According to correction published by the NYT, Paul Burnham Finney, characterized as a freelance or occasional writer for the paper, even though his on-line bio just indicates he writes for the Times among other high end publications, made a half-hearted attempt at moving into the fast paced and very competitive “fake story” department of the New York Times. He apparently sought to join the ranks of such luminaries as Jonathan Broder of the Chicago Tribune, Janet Cooke of the Washington Post (1981 Pulitzer Prize winner for her fake story “Jimmy”) and Jayson Blair, the Times most recent heavy hitter.
 
You may remember Jayson Blair, the fast rising star of the Times affirmative action program, who famously posted stories from places he’d never been, about people he’d never met. Blair, in his short but prolific career, penned some 73 stories about events ranging from the DC snipers to the Iraqi War, which at last count had produced some 36 articles with false comments, events, and fabricated emotionally charged scenes from the war. Blair also was an equally prolific “borrower” (a journalistic term meaning to plagiarize) of other writer's news stories, and by frequently using out of context photos to enhance his work.

Finney, a mere travel writer, used an American Psychological Association survey to reinforce his opinion that the Wall Street crisis was affecting business and banking travelers asserting that "the crisis on Wall Street was the No. 1 cause of anxiety".

His article, quoted here in part, states: [bolded portion is Mr. Finney’s since it never appeared in the survey conclusion]

In its latest annual “Stress in America” survey, based on 2,507 online interviews in September, the American Psychological Association found that the crisis on Wall Street was the No. 1 cause of anxiety. And participants in the survey said the places where they felt most vulnerable to stress were in the office and on a business trip.”
 
[The following extract from the Times correction tells a different story]:

The survey included data from Sept. 19 to Sept. 23, 2008, a period of volatility on Wall Street, but none of the questions in the association’s survey referred to Wall Street or any economic crises. Participants were not asked how business travel affected their stress levels or where they felt most vulnerable to stress.”

The article also quoted incorrectly from a comment by Nancy Molitor, a psychologist in Wilmette, Ill., who told the author that, “In my 20 years of practice I’ve never seen such anxiety among my patients,” not “among my banking and business patients.”

A stern Editors' Note admits that a Times writer "distorted the survey's findings to fit his theme, contrary to The Times's standards of integrity."

The Times is perfectly correct in it’s stern admonishment of Mr. Finney. This fake story is a far cry from the “gold standard” the public has come to expect in a fabricated story by the New York Times, much less that of the lesser “off the record” newspapers. The venerable “Grey Lady”, the paper of “record”, has come to represent the epitome of “out of context”, plagiarized, and false reporting. This upstart travel writer falls far short of the mark for the quality of fiction that regular readers of the Times expect and deserve.
 
Mr. Sulzberger, heir to the paper awarded the most Pulitzer Prizes, is surely very disappointed. Joseph Pulitzer, the famed "yellow journalist", must be spinning in his grave at the thought of the paper that has received so many of the awards that bear his name falling short of the mark for distortion that made Columbia University initially refuse his funding for the School of Journalism. This is a dark hour indeed for a paper that has made its reputation by leaking serious intelligence information and attempting to bring down republican Presidents.
 
This reporter suggests an internship at the National Enquirer where Mr. Finney can hone his skills assisting on stories about 96-year-old grannies giving birth to Aliens or perhaps a stint on the “Brangelina” desk. Mr. Finney is clearly not ready for prime time.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (65) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Words Also Are Sometimes Silly

While I am still too angry to take on the subject of bailouts right at the moment, several comments on the previous post led me to an examination of some of the News and Political speak currently in vogue. Who could forget “gravitas”, especially since Rush Limbaugh put it through his sound bite montage, endlessly? There are many fine examples of this annoying trend.

ScarletPimernel started things off with his wife’s pet peeve, “negative growth”, and added in his own right: "Before they became "investments", taxes were "contributions" under the Great Billy Jeff.” [Note: Ronaldus Magnus, led the way, giving us “revenue enhancement”] BrianR, responding to Scarlet, took a military tack with “retrograde advance”, meaning Retreat.

This exchange reminded me of a recent article from the Scottish Rite Journal titled “THE JARGON GENERATOR” which I have shamelessly “borrowed” and reproduced below. [I hope they don’t kick me out. HaHaHa!] So, for the edification and amusement of the readers, here is some fun with jargoning.

[From the Scottish Rite Journal]
 
THE JARGON GENERATOR

Ever wonder how bureaucrats, educators and others come up with the terminology they unload on an unsuspecting public?
 
The fellow who put it together is a Sweetwater Union High School Districts Administrator from Sweetwater, Texas who for obvious reasons shall remain anonymous.

His creation consists of three columns of nine words each. The first two columns consist of multi-syllabic adjectives, and the third contains ambiguous nouns that defy strict definition.

1. integrated 1. management 1. outputs
2. total 2. organizational 2. flexibility
3. systematized 3. monitored 3. analysis
4. parallel 4. reciprocal 4. mobility
5. functional 5. logistical 5. factors
6. responsive 6.transitional 6. concept
7. synchronized 7. modular 7. capability
8. compatible 8. creative 8. guidelines
9. balanced 9. operational 9. contingencies

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To use the Jargon Generator, merely take any three-digit number and apply each digit to the corresponding sequential column.

For instance, the number 263 will give you “total transitional analysis,” an impressive and erudite phrase that can be applied in almost any situation.

And 953 will give you “balanced logistical analysis,” a statement that you can use to establish your expertise and authority on any subject.

Use of the Jargon generator when you really have nothing to say, the author points out, will result in absolutely no one knowing what you’re talking about.

But, he adds, what really matters is that (1) they’ll never admit it and (2) they will be able to accept you as a decisive thinker who possesses great ability to verbalize complex ideas. Sort of a 297, one might say. 
 
                                                                                      Scottish Rite Bulletin
 
Have at it! Feel free to embellish to your hearts content. The author is confident in the abilities of the readers to produce 581.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (58) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Words Have Power!

Most will recall that Bill Clinton, a man who clearly understands the power of words, took his place in the pantheon of linguistics giants when he said, "it depends on what the meaning of is, is". This was an historic moment in the evolution of political speak. Lesser beings have tried to equal this high standard, George Bush for example said, "Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"
 
Apparently, the President is at war, not just with terror, but also the English language. This sadly does not qualify him for elevation to the level of a Bill Clinton but is impressive as a substantial body of work, rivaling that of Joe Biden's 36 year career, achieving it in a mere seven and half years.
 
Some time ago now, Global Warming, or AGW, was a term in everyday use, when suddenly the term morphed into Climate Change. No individual is easily cited for originating that reference, however, the media immediately seized on the term and is largely credited for the change in daily usage. This simple change in the words seems trivial but I suggest that since it's introduction the planet has begun to cool. Words do indeed have power!
 
Now, John McCain has entered the arena and tackled the biggest issue of our day; the economy. McCain may be a serious contender in the words to power world. Just yesterday he changed the term Wall Street Bailout to Wall Street Rescue. If the theory established in the AGW model is workable, we should immediately see improvements in financial markets and the overall economy.
 
America hates bailing people out of problems of their making but we dearly love to rescue people. We must love it, since we have been doing practically nothing else since the end of World War II. The fact is, we are so generous that we are now 10-11 trillion dollars in debt as a country with no end in sight ,as congress continues to pour on the ethanol (you can't say coal anymore).  The train wreck is going to be spectacular!
 
Tell congress to stop the train, we want to get off. Let the market finds it's own way. Congress has created enough problems already by fixing things, it's time for some unfixing. Abolish the CRA and eliminate the Banking Rules of '99 and get out the private sector altogether. That would be a good place to start before moving on to drilling for oil, stopping illegal aliens, eliminating earmarks, getting out of education, passing the fair tax, stopping subsides, shrinking government, and fiddling with our light bulbs.

When you get that done get back to me, I have more!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (57) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rasmussen Eat Your Heart Out!

I conducted a mini survey at the local convenience store this morning. Here are the results of the 25 people polled for their reaction to last night’s debate.

10 – didn’t watch the debate. (This is not complete voter apathy. One guy lives in his pickup truck and has no TV)

3 - thought Obama won.

1.5 - thought McCain won (the half point is given for the answer "the old white guy" since the voting machines don't have pictures of the candidates.)

6 - said "What debate?"

2 - answered "What election?"

2 - mumbled "No hablo ingles"

1 - though McCain was Kissinger and also that Kissinger was dead.

The margin of error for this poll was +/-24.5

At this point the mathematicians out there are probably saying, “Hey, that’s 26 votes?”, and they would be right. Apparently, even in a small poll there is an element of voter fraud.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (43) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Once Again Government to Save Us from Government

You have a job. You’re getting by even in the face of rising food and gas prices and your managing to pay the mortgage on time. Your 401k plan has taken a slide but you still have time to recover since it a long-term investment and you understand this. The housing market is down but you are feeling like it will rebound given time, so you cut expenses and hope things don’t get too expensive. Your plan is simple; play defense and wait it out.

Does this scenario sound familiar to anyone? It should, since it describes most of Middle America.

Enter the government and the wizards of Wall Street. They have a plan too. It’s been in place for 30 years beginning with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1978 and culminating in the Clinton Banking Bill in 1999. CNN reported the signing of the later on November 12, 1999 saying in part: [emphasis is mine]
 
 
"This legislation is truly historic and it indicates what can happen when Republicans and Democrats work together in a spirit of genuine cooperation," Clinton said at a White House signing ceremony. The event brought together the president and several Republican members of Congress who have been among Clinton's sternest critics -- a sign of the bipartisan support that eventually developed for the package." [Don’t we just love bi-partisan support?]

"Congress passed the bipartisan measure November 5, opening the way for a blossoming of financial "supermarkets" selling loans, investments and insurance. Proponents had pushed the legislation in Congress for two decades, and Wall Street and the banking and insurance industries had poured millions of dollars into lobbying for it in the past few years."
 
"The world changes, and Congress and the laws have to change with it," said Senate Banking Committee Chairman Phil Gramm (R-Texas)” [Gramm could have said this yesterday and probably did!]

Read the full story here but the names are same as our current crisis champions. The same people who touted in glowing terms the creation of these “supermarkets” are now telling us that they are too big to allow them to fail.
 
The most damaging element of this legislation was the item most desired by the Clinton administration and had been the sticking point in the negotiations. Here is a quote from the CNN piece:

“…the Clinton Administration itself had threatened a veto of the legislation as it took various forms that raised a series of White House objections. In recent months, the administration objected most sharply to the issue of rules requiring that banks make loans in minority and low-income communities where they operate.” [This is the foundation of the misbegotten idea that homeownership is a right, regardless of ability to pay]

There is absolutely no good reason that the taxpayers should be happy about buying these toxic assets. We are constantly being bombarded with the idea that we need to “make investments” (read: be further taxed) in a myriad of government giveaways, bridge boondoggles, green alternatives, and a host of other unwanted or unnecessary programs. We don’t even get the courtesy of a prospectus from these “snake oil” salesmen.
 
Why would anyone, who fits the opening scenario, want to invest in a known bad investment? If we wouldn’t buy stock in AIG last month why would we want to buy it now? This is not how you go about keeping your assets.

The bailout is filled with hopes and promises that this will not happen. They say, Uncle will hold these properties until they can be sold at profitable prices. Should we believe that a glut of standing property doesn’t depress the sales market? Of course these are the same people who said the ’99 banking bill was revolutionary and would foster prosperity and huge savings for taxpayers.

Pardon me if I don’t cheer as another example of central planning goes down in flames, only to replaced by an even bigger scheme of central planning. This is a failure of government of colossal proportions. Any self-respecting person who was involved in this should resign quietly.

Have no fear. There will be a bailout package. The only question remaining is how bad will it fail? Congressional republicans should avoid this like the plague.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (25) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator DeMint Needs Your Support on Drilling!!!

Senator Jim DeMint has been among the strongest supporters in the Senate for drilling and other viable solutions to America's energy problems. He and his colleagues are asking for public support on this issue as outlined in the following except from his email.
 
"I know you are very busy, but I need your immediate help."

"As you know, the twenty-five year ban on offshore drilling will expire on October 1st. In the coming days the Senate will be debating on whether or not to renew the ban. I believe that we should not renew the ban and begin drilling in our territories to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but I need to know what you think."

"Should we let the twenty-five year ban on offshore drilling expire?"

"Should we stop frivolous lawsuits from left-wing environmental groups that have delayed energy production for years?"
 
He has a poll site at this link: http://www.jimdemint.com/drilling-survey/
 
Although, it looks as if the ban will expire because the opponents of drilling lack the time to pass an extension, this issue will not die on it's own. Stopping the environmental lawsuits are a matter of critical importance to our energy future. I urge all THer's to give him the support he needs. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (48) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Putting the Election Aside for a Moment…

The do nothing congress is back in session and, in typical style, have these spectacular accomplishments to add to their already fine record. According to my representatives weekly report this is what they managed to get done this week.

Two bills to name post offices. Two bills to name courthouses. A bill to create congressional clerkships. A bill to allow electronic pay stubs for congressional employees. And a study of two rivers in Vermont.
After a five week recess, these bills were on the short list of items the House of Representatives debated and voted on this week. The House leadership also cut the week short, so there was no debate or votes on Friday
.” – Randy Forbes (R-VA)

They did debate, and tabled until next week, a bill to increase visas for the coming year from a mere 1 million to 1.55 million. This at a time when we have just passed the 6% unemployment rate, and it is still rising.


Americans for Prosperity, a watchdog group, has sent the following warning:

The clock is ticking down to October 1st, 2008 -- the expiration date for the current Congressional ban on offshore drilling and oil shale recovery.

Expanding domestic energy production by getting at untapped U.S. resources is the key to lowering prices at the pump -- so contact your lawmaker today and tell them to DO NOTHING. That's right. Tell your lawmaker that doing nothing is the right thing to do for American energy consumers
.”

Nancy Pelosi and other liberal leaders know they are running out of time to save their political skins, so they’ve put together a sham proposal they claim would allow “drilling.” Tell your lawmakers not to be fooled! Democratic proposals that claim to allow drilling are just ploys designed to erect huge new permanent hurdles to meaningful oil exploration and to hike taxes on energy.”

Contact your lawmakers. Urge them to support letting the current ban on offshore drilling expire by DOING NOTHING.”

This is AFP’s suggested action plan. I certainly sounds like something they shouldn’t have any problem accomplishing. Who wants to bet that the Do Nothing Congress would actually Do Nothing!

Rep. Pence is saying that republicans are poised to force the energy issue next week. It is this writer’s hope that they are not walking into an ambush driven by their zeal for the “all of the above” position. This will require careful scrutiny at a time when many voters are distracted by the prospect of a GOP win in November.

We will need to keep our heads on a swivel as long as congress is session with Red Nanny at the helm.

Update! There is a first look at the democrat energy bill at the following link: http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/11/meanwhile-back-in-washington/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (79) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Experience Counts?

Much as been said about the various experience quotients of the candidates since the selection of Ms. Palin by John McCain. There have been arguments and counter-arguments by the hatful. So, in the interest of reason and logic, with apologies to my former math teachers, this writer will make an attempt at a mathematical solution.

For purposes of this drill it is asked that the reader stipulate to a few facts not really in evidence but necessary for this essay to proceed to it’s conclusion. First, it is taken as true that experience as a U.S. Senator relates to the Presidency, equally with experience as a State Governor. Second, none of the current candidates has ever served as President.

We start with W being use to represent “wrinkly old white dudes” regardless of party affiliation. Junior Senators appear as J raised to the power of “s” with Junior Governors being shown as J raised to the power of ‘g” and overall, let E equal experience and T equal ticket. So the Obama/Biden ticket would be expressed as:

(Js – E) + (W + E) = T or in plain language, the Obama/Biden ticket

Similarly McCain/ Palin becomes:

(W + E) + (Jg – E) = T again for clarity McCain/Palin ticket

Since T is equal to T we can conclude that these tickets are evenly matched.

Let us now examine the “heart beat away” scenario. For this equation we will use the superscripted 25 to equal the nomination of a new VP under the 25th amendment as was the case with Gerald Ford’s elevation and in turn Nelson Rockefeller’s. The fact that this involves a sitting President calls for the addition of P equaling President. With that definition the formula for an early departure on the part John McCain would be expressed thus:

(Jg – E) + (W + E)25 = P or President Palin choosing an experienced VP by nomination.

In the opposing situation the formula becomes more complicated. Since Biden has few friends it is difficult to determine from what source he might draw a nominee. What can be concluded is that he would be hard pressed to find a more senior senator, representative or governor to serve as VP given his 36 years in the senate. Let the superscripted x represent an unknown person of lesser experience. Thus we get:

(W + E) + (Jx – E) = P or Biden choosing a VP of lesser experience.

In conclusion since T = T and P = P we can logically assume that there is NO argument on the experience issue in any combination. Let’s move on!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (62) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Behind Enemy Lines

Following the announcement by John McCain of his selection of Sarah Palin as his VP choice, this writer decided to take a peek at a comment thread running on CNN’s website. After reading some of the comments, three that stood out are listed below.

[Whoops! What happened to “you can have it all”?]
“What is she going to do with her 5 month old baby during the campaing? is she putting her career before her family? from what is been told by the media he is a baby with special needs. As a mother I question her decision specially with all the time she would need to spend away from home” – Sandra [sic]

[Do women still make coffee in the office?]
“I was one of those 18 million cracks and there is no way I would vote for McCain. He is wrong on all the issues. They just don't get it do they. I doubt they would let her have any real say in the debate anyway. She'll be making coffee in the white house” [sic]


[Remember this one. We’ll return to it later.]
“So, what exactly is the historic nature of her nomination? Ferraro was picked as a running mate for Mondale well over 2 decades ago. Oh I get it.. it's historic because she is historically the least qualified person to manage to get their name on a major party ticket. Congrats to Danny Quayle for finally moving down to the #2 spot.”

The thought occurred that it would be interesting to see what the real loony left was saying. With that objective in mind the solution was obvious, I needed to do a recon patrol.

I pause for the benefit of those not familiar with this kind of exercise. A successful recon is one that gathers information and DOES NOT result in a firefight. In and out with no one the wiser. Standard camouflage is inadequate in a virtual typographic environment so other individual protective measures must be employed. Cover and concealment take on a new meaning in this situation. I began to prepare by first reciting, “Bush lied, people died” over and over again. I made a quick trip to “Stuff White People Like” to sharpen my metrosexual rhetoric and lastly, did a rapid review of all the Starbucks jargon I could remember.

Thus prepared, this reporter ventured to the democratic underground site. So, brought to you at great personal risk, here are some of the themes we will be hearing for the next 66 days.

Troopergate: This seems to be a non-starter scandal but dems are trying to hang their hats on it.

No experience: This one will probably have legs but oddly it pits Obama rather than Biden against the GOP VP nominee using the “one heart beat away” argument.

Beauty Queen: This one was very popular and showed up frequently.

Trophy wife: McCain’s not Todd’s apparently.

Lastly, remember I said we’d come back to this one; she’s the second coming of Dan Quayle.

There of course will be more once the Obama people get their balance but these were early reactions and were already in evidence from the democrat talking heads during the O’Reilly Show last night. Whether this helps of hurts McAmnesty is anybody’s guess but in the end it’s the bloggers of the world who were real winners yesterday. Fodder for the cannons friends. Let the entertainment begin!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (40) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Choice

As the political silly season has proceeded it has become painfully obvious to this writer that none of the candidates are qualified to be President. We need a proven leader with experience in both government and the private sector. One who has actually read the constitution. One who is intimately familiar with life in the middle class, can pump his own gas, and pays his own bills. This would also be an historic first. In the history of the Presidency no former Marine has ever served as President. It's time for a change!
 
 
 
So get on the bandwagon and vote Relic '08! I'm Sgt Relic and I approved this message.
 
I failed to properly acknowledge my Brother-in-Law for sending me this link. Thanks Dave!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (82) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A New Power Grab from EPA!

Many of you will remember with great fondness when Al Gore tried to explain his phone calls from the White House soliciting Democratic campaign contributions by citing that there was "no controlling legal authority". EPA is one of those federal agencies that seems to have paid attention to this kind of weaseling speech. This largely unregulated, power hungry agency, is set for a massive expansion of power by once again overreaching it's mandate to include CO2 emissions. Here is the text of the email I received from "Americans for Prosperity" calling for public help to turn back this growth of government.
 
The EPA is asking for public comments on its intention to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, something the Act was never designed to do. We need your voice to be heard.
Over the past year, AFP has been warning you about global warming alarmism and the environmental political correctness that it has spawned. One of the greatest dangers this alarmism presents is the continued rise of unelected bureaucrats and their attempts to grab power from the people. The proposed regulation by the EPA is a clear example of the regulations this panic will produce.
After the Senate rejected a plan to regulate greenhouse gases, the EPA decided to go ahead and do it anyway. The extent of their plan is truly terrifying. If this proposal becomes law, 33 programs within the EPA would be empowered to, among other things:

• Impose Grass Mileage Standards for Home Lawnmowers
• Put Speed Limiters on the Commercial Trucking Fleet
• List Large Single-Family Homes as Carbon-Polluters
• Require Carbon Permits for Retail, Restaurant, Hotel and School Construction
 
We need your help to tell the EPA this is unacceptable. Environmentalists will be stuffing the comment box with their opinion; we need you to make your voice heard. "
 
I urge the TH community to read this information and help to head off this carbon grab before it can get started.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (21) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Here's a Wild Stab in the Dark

Post-mortem: It's Biden! And he brings to the campaign the first broken promise of the joint ticket. Anyone remember this quote from Mr. Clean? "I would not accept it if anyone offered it to me. The fact of the matter is I'd rather stay as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee than be vice president." So much for integrity. Well, thanks for playing everyone. That was fun!

Update2! Drudge now reports that it may be Bayh. The source? Printers printing bumper stickers!!!

Update!
Fox News is reporting that Obama has curtailed advertising in battleground states.(money problems???) 

The Drudge Report provides this link, to an article concerning the Democratic Party’s potential nominee. The name of Chet Edwards has surfaced causing some high degree of speculation on the part of pundits, politicians and the MSM. The article states in part:

Barack Obama prepares to name running mate

Rep. Chet Edwards, whose district includes President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, had made the list of finalists. Sens. Joe Biden of Delaware and Evan Bayh of Indiana were also in the mix, as were Govs. Tim Kaine of Virginia and Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas—and any unknown others Obama had managed to keep secret despite intense scrutiny.”

Couple that information with the following three quotes:

Obama told reporters on Thursday he's already made his choice, and aides have used the prospect of a text-message announcement to try and attract additional supporters by soliciting their cell phone numbers and e-mail addresses.”

Hundreds of miles to the west, carpenters, electricians, sound stage gurus and others transformed the Pepsi Center in Denver into a made-for-television convention venue.”

Tucked away in one corner were thousands of lightweight rolled cardboard handles, meant to allow delegates to wave signs bearing the names of the ticket—once the identity of Obama's running mate was known. “

And the inquiring mind of a printer asks: “Would Obama name a candidate strictly based on the fact that they had already printed millions of signs reading Obama/Edwards ’08??? We should know the answer very soon. Ha! Ha! Ha!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (44) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wait a Tic?

A story being reported at Fox News indicates that some Mexican border towns are striking back at Americans crossing to buy subsidized gas and diesel fuel by levying fines.

"The city of Ciudad Acuna, across the border from Del Rio, Texas, said Friday that it fined four U.S. residents for carrying extra diesel and would impound their cars until they pay. The fines equal 70 percent of the value of the diesel confiscated.
U.S. drivers can fill up their own vehicles, but carrying extra fuel containers back across the border violates customs regulations and possibly safety rules, a report from the city said
."

So carrying extra containers back across the border violates customs rules? But Mexican citizens entering the U.S. without papers or bothering to stop at a customs station, DOESN'T?

Safety rules? What about the fleets of vehicles carrying pharmaceuticals not approved by the FDA?

Perhaps we could settle these fines in another way. How about requiring U.S. citizens to return four illegals for every container they remove? Kind of a refundable bottle scheme. Or maybe a National program! We could call it the "People for Oil" program. Kofi is retired. I think he would be perfect as the first People Czar!

Any thoughts?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (71) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Tribute to Madame Speaker

I am sure that we are all aware that the Congress, exhausted from doing absolutely nothing, has taken an early recess. A five week recess mind you, not the simple 15 minutes you remember from grade school. Any business left undone? Pretty much everything.

Yesterday, in a overt display of arrogance the Speaker, Red Nanny (Marxist-CA), dropped the gavel, turned out the lights and cut the feed to C-Span without bringing drilling to a vote. That's right! The Nanny of the House thought it best that the people's representatives not be allowed a voice or a vote which might interfere with her plan to "save the planet" and continue her book tour.
 
To their credit 22 Republicans remained, ordered up pizza, welcomed in the public and gave their speeches in the dark, sans microphones, until the building closed. These members are worthy of the name representative and I will list them in a future post. For now, here is an offering I thought appropriate to the occasion. So, with apologies to the Pythons and one of my all time favorite movies "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" I present "The Ballad of Red Nanny". (based upon Sir Robin's minstrel's song, those with coconut shells can furnish your own acommpaniment.)
 
Bravely bold Red Nanny fled from D.C..
She was not afraid to fly, O brave Red Nanny.
She was not at all afraid, to be sly in nasty ways,
Brave, brave, brave, brave Red Nanny!

She was not in the least bit scared, to be turned out in the fall,
Or to have her minions turn out the lights, and cameras one and all,
To end her day in a sneaky way while slipping down the hall
And to thumb her nose at the people’s plight ,
brave, brave, brave, brave Red Nanny!

Her party smashed and it’s power cut off
And her office removed and her gavel be gone
And her district be raped as the prices goes up
And her name be as mud and her record be nine.
O brave, brave Red Nanny!

Brave Red Nanny ran away,
Bravely ran away, away.
When drilling for oil reared its ugly head, she bravely turned her tail and fled.
Yes, brave Red Nanny turned about
And gallantly, she chickened out. Bravely taking to her plane,
She beat a very brave retreat,
Bravest of the brave, Red Nanny!

She is packing it in and packing it up
And sneaking away and b*ggering off
And chickening out and pi$$ing off home,
Yes, bravely she is taking her ball home,
Not so brave, Red Nanny!
 
The Speaker demonstrated very clearly yesterday exactly whose country she thinks this is, and it ain't ours!

Update! Proving once again the power of the blogsphere RedState has video from the House floor during the revolt. See it here: http://www.redstate.com/diaries/jeff_emanuel/2008/aug/02/looking-back-on-the-house-gop-sit-in/
 
NEW UPDATE! This is a list of participants from the minority leaders website that shows a few names missing from the previous list.
 
Reps. Brian Bilbray, Gus Bilirakis, Rob Bishop, Roy Blunt, John Boehner, John Boozman, Kevin Brady, Paul Broun, Henry Brown, Michael Burgess, John Campbell, Eric Cantor, Shelly Moore Capito, John Carter, Tom Cole, Mike Conaway, John Culberson, Charlie Dent, Mary Fallin, Jeff Fortenberry, Virginia Foxx, Louie Gohmert, Wally Herger, Pete Hoekstra, Duncan Hunter, Steve King, Dan Lungren, Don Manzullo, Kevin McCarthy, Thaddeus McCotter, Devin Nunes, Mike Pence, Chip Pickering, Todd Platts, Ted Poe, Jon Porter, Tom Price, Adam Putnam, Bill Sali, John Shadegg, John Shimkus, Adrian Smith, Mike Turner, Tim Walberg, Greg Walden, and Lynn Westmoreland.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (108) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is $4 Dollars the Real Tipping Point?

“Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.” - H.L. Mencken

Over on the TH front page today we have this offering from Michael Barone “A Step Back From Enviro Lunacy”. Mr. Barone makes an argument for drilling and nuclear power and an escape from environmentalism. Although I support his overall conclusion, I remain unconvinced that his analysis would bear close scrutiny on several points. He points to the more centralized (read socialist) governments as being in a better position to ignore enviro-wackos but fails to point out that Japan, France and Chicago (not technically a country), his examples, also have very high gas prices because of the taxation, the result of socialism, that goes along with central planning and authority. He correctly identifies $4 a gallon as the tipping point that stirs the masses and here is where we diverge.

It's $4 for a hue and cry but where is the tipping point for congress? $5? $6? The tipping point for congress is the price at which democrats begin to throw THEIR bad apples out of congress. I don't see any sign of that happening.

Environmental obstructionism is a large part of the problem, but an uneducated or disengaged public is an even bigger one. A politicized judiciary doesn’t help much either as they hand down ruling after ruling against the best interests of the public. Remember, carbon being defined as a pollutant is a SCOTUS decision, not a scientific fact. As Justice Scalia correctly observed in the decent, the loose definition of airborne pollutants is broad enough to include Frisbees under that ruling. Anyone care to plug Frisbees into that AGW computer model?

An issue of this magnitude requires leadership, leadership we obviously don’t have in place with our current crop of finger in the wind politicians. Where then is the leadership on this issue? Obama? Hardly, he thinks $4 is fine. McAmnesty? Lukewarm, he’s busy trying to be a democrat himself. Mr. Newt the Green Conservative? I think not, the image of him playing slap and tickle with Red Nanny is still too fresh. T. Boone with his birdie cuisinarts? He's just in it for the federal subsidizes on wind power. Who and where is the Anti-Gore?

If Mr. Barone is correct it takes money and a mouthpiece to turn back 35 years of wandering in the green wilderness. Doesn’t anyone out there want to be as rich as Al Gore? Win an Oscar? Pick up that Nobel Prize you always wanted?

We need a movement and movements require leaders. A leaderless Army is easily defeated, not so, an Army with a Washington, a Lee or a Patton standing at it’s head. So I repeat, who wants to lead? The Army is here. Where’s the General?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (83) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive